The Conman's Promise and its Takeaways
If a person’s character is flawed, how do you judge their
words? If a person is proven to be a liar, cheat and debaucherously individual,
can you trust what they say at face value? Or do their underlying principles
fundamentally change the definition of their comments, regardless of whether or
not you believed them at first?
These are the questions that are posed when dealing with the yogi
Babu Vivekanand. At his first introduction in the beginning of chapter 9, Babu
spouts revelation after wise proverb, one upping each statement with one even
more profound than the last. He poses to be an interesting character. On one hand,
he delivers much of what this book is about, traditionalism vs modernism and,
more importantly, that we are all brought together through the fundamental nature
of the similarity of human existence. Or, that we all share something between
us, a desire to have community with others, pain from the countless physical irregularities,
prejudices and evils that affect us, and fear of this pain and unknowingness if
we will be part of something meaningful.
The conman does both, identifies what makes us weak and
offers a solution for it. This conman, however, does not offer solutions that
will truly give us security and complacency, but instead fulfills only short
term goals which “generate even bigger and intractable problems (99).” This occurs
all the time, it is the very basis of marketing and persuasion. We see this
with industries such as clothing, makeup, acne and other skincare medications,
and ads for plastic surgeries and liposuctions, among many others. There is a
distinctive flaw that we all, or at least a great majority, have. We, like the
US and USSR, practice “terror disguised as vigilance (104).” We attempt to make
ourselves look the part we are acting for and more importantly, ashamed of the
superficial aspects of us as the actor, and we fear being found out of these
so-called “shortcomings.” Our values are superficial as we focus too much on
the flighted and temporary guises we seek. We make ourselves vulnerable to the reoccurring
con of beauty standards and fall for its short-term bonuses, feeling
failure when they are not perfectly achieved, or placing them so high on a
scale that we do not even attempt to achieve them, and feel as failures for never
trying.
Now, I do not resent the industries of fashion and beauty. There
is inherent value in the seemingly superficial qualities of these things, and
to partake in them is not a shortcoming of one’s person. However, it is the paranoia
and constant pressures of perfection that are placed on us, the vulnerable and
insecure, who seek continuous safety from the mania of living without a safety
net. Because our desires are so heavily influenced by a shortcoming of a constant
source of fulfillment, we are always conned. Just as the conman rips people off
for personal gain, so too does the marketing of “perfection” con us by offering
a piece of what we desire and selling it as the full thing. Those who fall into
a hypocritical two-sidedness between personal fulfillment and meaningless
distraction, or who disguise their lack of materiality to be anything more than
a hypocritical self-congratulation, or those who delve fully into the
superficial and call it anything more than that, are byproducts of this con.
So, this brings it back to the original questions, can you
trust the conman who’s words are right (or have a hint of truth) but who’s purpose
is fully self-involved? The answer then comes through what brings us together, a
family of insecure and unsecured individuals seeking answers. All it takes is for
proper forward movement, to get us past the obsession of material and fetishization
of the spiritual, and instead find a place in the middle, which accepts supposed
short-comings and imperfections, and allows for true discussion to occur
through a community that understands.
Comments
Post a Comment