Homelands Analysis - Wendt
A concrete
definition of home, as we have come to realize from this class, may not exist.
The understanding is much more conceptual and personal than physical and
visible. “Home” is more of a phenomenon that occurs both naturally and/or
through augmentation than a found “thing”.
It is not so much a homeland that Wendt is concerned with rather the
concept of comfortability itself, an item we see the boy struggle with
throughout Part One. As people of the sea, sea travel is not only an integral
plotline, but also a way of life for these people. The concept of “home” for
the Samoan is not a land they are looking for but one they have left and an
identity they have taken with them. But like any memory or idea, it can fade. The
boy even recalls very little of Samoa and to his girlfriend confides that he is
not sure if he even wants to return home.
When
trying to communicate the concept of a Samoan’s connection to a built, physical
homeland, Wendt employs a very interesting metaphor to distill the actual item
from the felt sensation. The dump, as it were, was an undesirable piece of
land, full of rotting garbage and unclean creatures, there was nothing
inherently welcoming about the area. But to the young brothers, it was a land
of opportunity. The dump was made “out of the discarded, useless ends of the
city, the boys constructed castles, houses, and roads: a miniature city which
belonged totally to them” (Wendt, 25). I suppose that one man’s waste is
another man’s treasure, but using materials deemed useless by others, albeit,
Westerners, to create a “homeland” unique to the boys harkens back to the idea
of a culture and people being discarded, and having to make their own space out
of the ashes. Though Wendt does not go into detail, one can imagine what their
“city” looks like, and, to an outsider, it would indeed resemble a pile of
trash, not a “fabulous city” (Wendt, 29).
Wendt
experimented with the idea of a non-intrinsic homeland, which has little to no
natural value, but once injected with application and determination could be
rendered into something useful. The fact that the boys were keen enough, and
perhaps young enough to find worth in the dump helps negotiate the Samoan
understating of New Zealand, which to them is a utility. The Samoans living in
New Zealand take advantage of the job market and the valuable lifestyle but are
aware of their usage of the space and intended on leaving. Though Wendt also
explores the idea of homeland identity, and the boy’s questioning of his own
position as a Samoan in New Zealand, the Samoan zeitgeist seems to be wanting
to journey “home” to Samoa. Much emphasis, it is important to note, is put on
the journey back to Samoa, not the arrival.
A Samoan’s “home”
as here exemplified by Wendt, is fluid and changing. Attachment to a particular
surrounding, despite its investiture is not a hallmark of the culture. Even
after spending much time developing their city, the boys “destroyed their city…
only to reconstruct it in a different pattern the following week” (Wendt, 25).
This open relationship with the idea of a “home” or a welcoming space, as
exemplified by the boys, helps us to gain insight into the idea of the Samoan
homeland.
Comments
Post a Comment